Alphora Labs
Crypto risk analysis for researchers
Risk analysis turns vague fear into named failure modes. Liquidity, unlocks, contracts, custody, and narrative half-life are usually more important than the next candle.
Workflow
Discover → Ask → Basket
Focus
Research, not noise
Start
Free to explore

Ethereum
$3,412 +1.8%
Vol
$12.4B
Rank
#2
Bias
Watch
- Name the top three ways you lose money
- Size for liquidity, not just conviction
- Treat unlock calendars as first-class risk
- Write falsifiers you will actually honor
Risk buckets that matter
Name market and liquidity risk, supply risk, technical and security risk, counterparty or custody risk, regulatory surface, and narrative risk. Score them qualitatively before you obsess over price targets. Vague unease does not change position size; named failure modes do.
Liquidity risk is often underweighted. If you cannot exit without wrecking the book, your thesis already includes forced timing. Venue depth, slippage, and concentration belong next to unlock tables on every mid/small-cap note. Keep research educational in posture even when conviction feels high.
Alphora’s Research Score includes a risk-oriented category as triage. Treat it as a prompt to dig, not a shield. Crypto risk analysis remains your responsibility; the product is research software, not advice. A clean Pass is progress when the float path fails basic tests.
Supply and concentration failures
Unlock cliffs, emissions, and whale-heavy floats create paths where price breaks without a product bug. Map who can sell and whether the book can absorb them. Concentration risk rises when a few wallets dominate circulating supply. Shared baskets reduce Discord paste chaos for small research teams.
Memecoins and microcaps fail these tests first, but larger names are not immune around TGEs and major cliffs. Pair on-chain holder views with vesting docs when the thesis is sizeable enough to care. Specialized on-chain tools still need a desk where decisions stick.
Technical, custody, and narrative risk
Smart contracts, bridges, admin keys, and oracles fail in ways that charts cannot warn you about early enough. Write assumptions plainly: what must remain true for funds to be recoverable and for the peg or wrapper to hold. Points-era metrics deserve a permanent discount until retention proves out.
Narrative risk is the half-life of attention. A sector can go quiet while code still runs. Define what would make the story stale and which monitors would show decay before you need a postmortem. Compare fee quality across peers before crowning a narrative leader.
Operationalizing risk inside Alphora
Use Discover to Pass names that fail liquidity or unlock sniff tests quickly. Run Ask for structured risk lists and kill criteria. Track survivors in baskets so you see whether risk management matched outcomes. Write recipient incentives next to every unlock date you underline.
Revisit risk notes when catalysts approach. Static risk sections age poorly. The point of token risk analysis is living falsifiers, not a one-time checkbox. Market-cap bands change which risks dominate — adjust the checklist. Avoid slogans that collapse when liquidity or unlocks shift.
Frequently asked questions
- Does Alphora eliminate crypto risk?
- No tool does. Alphora helps structure risk thinking; markets remain risky and research is not advice.
- What risk should I check first on small caps?
- Liquidity versus your size, then unlock path and holder concentration. Security and custody follow closely for DeFi-heavy names.
- How do falsifiers differ from risks?
- Risks are ways you can lose. Falsifiers are observable conditions that should force you to cut or rewrite — write both.
- Is narrative risk real if the product works?
- Yes. Attention and liquidity can leave even when code ships. Price paths care about both.